How Should Our Society Assign Value To Human Life?

[name][professor][date of submission][course]The Value of LifeSince epoch immemorial , on that point were m any(prenominal) attempts to take in the survey of intent . During early multiplication , people were cosmea sold as wives , slaves and other functions . thither was tied(p) a fourth dimension wherein people had embraced the idea that there is no honor to animation at all , particularly during the time of the prevalence of existentialism . In the context of today s world , rough argues that animateness is now tending(p) comfort by achievements assay-mark , or the amount of salary one receives . But be these things qualified to be our measure of the value of life ? Or perhaps the more profound inquiry would be : is it until now possible to assign value to human lifeOn her article on TIME , entitled What is a Life Worth , Amanda Ripley had argued that the modern society s attempt to assign a value to life is based on property . The author had presented instances wherein somebody dies patch on the job , yet the family does non receive some(prenominal) compensation . It was analogous the family was expecting that someone pay financially for someone s death . Although , restitution and compensation is a popular demeanor of placing financial value to someone s life , it still does non sound serious . Money cannot simply be sufficiency to compensate for someone s life , simply because of the fact that we did not use money to acquire life . Moreover , any amount would not be enough to bring rump someone who is already dead . Yet this is the expression companies , the governance , and the families left skunk approach death of a soulfulness (RipleyInterestingly , William Shakespeargon , arguably the well-nigh influential writer of all time , presents a resultant role for de termining the value of life . by means of t! he monologue of the regarded best dramatic character of all time , tiny point , Shakespe be laid down his argument . hamlet s monologue suggests to us that life is intrinsically full of misfortunes .

The character of Hamlet is contemplating suicide , as he views this as the only representation to free himself of life s misfortunes (Hamlet ,Prince of Denmark ,Act III ,Sc .1It counts like both Ripley and Shakespeare are arguing that life can only be effrontery value through death . Moreover , their arguments are cogitate on the misfortunes of an individual . We know that life is full of misfortunes , and the re are still just as more despotic points to being aliveBoth pieces are also suggesting that the social status of a person has much to do with the value life . Ripley had explored the drumhead : is there a difference between a pathetic man and a rich man in damage of the value of life . Shakespeare is also seemingly suggesting the uniform nous as his protagonist , Hamlet , is belonging to a mellow social status - not to mention he is the prince of Denmark . heretofore saddening to think , both authors maybe irrefutably right . There seem to be a significant difference in the value of life between the average person and the favor ones...If you exigency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper